General MPG curiosity - 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Minivan Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-23-2016, 10:33 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
PacificaLimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston area
Posts: 246
General MPG curiosity

I know none of you will have the answers now, but just sharing my general curiosity of the future Gas-only MPG of the Hybrid Pacifica.

I am EXTREMELY pleased with the fuel economy of my current Pacifica Limited. Assuming that there is any level of accuracy and it's not exaggerated or falsified, I am averaging low-30s for MPG for my highway commute... some days, it's as high as 33-34 mpg. That (to me) is AMAZING for a vehicle of this size.

I assume that the Hybrid version will NOT be the same powertrain up front (just guessing) and until I get a job where there is EV parking/charging and/or I install one at home, I would want (need) the gas-only efficiency to be as-good if not better than my current Pacifica.

Crossing-fingers.

"I'll procrastinate later..."
PacificaLimited is online now  
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-24-2016, 06:36 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
PacificaLimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston area
Posts: 246
Question

Why was this thread moved to the "Lounge" section of the forums...? I posted it in the HYBRID section because it is specifically a curiosity about the HYBRID Pacifica.

EDIT: I just noticed the new sub-section about MPG, etc... but this really is HYBRID-centric.

*sigh* - okay, I guess.

"I'll procrastinate later..."
PacificaLimited is online now  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-26-2016, 01:30 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 1
On the gas-only MPG of the Hybrid model - in the Picifica brochure (on page 7) it states the following:

"Look to the Hybrid technology for outstanding fuel economy of 80 MPGe,* a 30-mile electric range,* and a total driving range of 530 miles* with V6 powertrain and charge. The Hybrid model may be plugged in and electrically charged, as well as through regenerative braking by the gasoline engine."

I'm interpreting that as 530 miles "total", so 30 miles of pure electric (@ 80 MPGe), followed by 500 miles of "hybrid" (@ X MPG). Further on in the brochure (page 27) it states that the Hybrid model has a 16.5 gallon fuel tank (the gas model having 19 gallons).

With this info and assuming 500 is an optimistic figure, as marketing documents usually are, then X should be 500 miles /16.5 gallons = 30.3 MPG. Lower than I had hoped but clearly better than the Gas model's supposed 22 MPG combined. Maybe I've made a mistake or am wrong in an assumption but that's my expectation for gas-only MPG at the moment.

Source: Pacifica brochure - https://www.chrysler.com/assets/pdf/...erPacifica.pdf
Bster is online now  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-26-2016, 07:41 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
PacificaLimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston area
Posts: 246
Yeah - I've seen the current vague stats and have done the same math - but we do not know for sure.
I am not a fan of the "combined" MPGe ratings... just tell me the combustion MPG and the electric range and be done with it.

I am hoping that the Hybrid version gets released in the next cpl months. Not like I'll be trading-in THAT soon, but it would be helpful to know.

"I'll procrastinate later..."
PacificaLimited is online now  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 08-26-2016, 12:23 PM
Junior Member
 
Jaypoocha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Hilton Head Island, SC
Posts: 17
Talking Great overall MPG, but this

Overall, I have been very impressed with the fuel efficiency of the Chrysler Pacifica. I have been averaging almost 27 MPG on long highway trips with the ACC activated with maximum occupants and luggage. I have one issue, the fuel tank is only 19 gallons! Although this is not the end of the world, it does call for more frequent fuel stops on the highway which is fine with my wife and two daughters for potty breaks. In comparison, our Honda Odyssey had a 21 gallon tank, good for an easy 500 miles with mixed driving conditions. The Pacifica will get you about 400 before the low fuelwarning light appears on the dashboard. This difference in tank size is not that big of a deal, but I did get spoiled with the larger tank on our previous minivan. All-in-all, I would say, size does matter, but despite the smaller tank, I still love the Pacifica. It is the best minivan I have owned for overall comfort, fuel efficiency and versatility.

Last edited by Jaypoocha; 08-26-2016 at 12:29 PM.
Jaypoocha is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-07-2016, 08:28 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 9
I'm wondering how this will do in mountainous regions. We always lose some fuel economy because of having to travel up mountains here but those with hybrids say they don't lose too much on theirs. This is a much bigger car than most of the other hybrids on the market at the moment though.
Mystic is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-08-2016, 09:56 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
PacificaLimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston area
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic View Post
... but those with hybrids say they don't lose too much on theirs.
My guess is that because with electricity, the energy consumed to get UP a mountain can be reclaimed going down via gravity and regenerative braking - whereas fossil fuel power gets burnt and any braking reduces stored energy/inertia into heat - not reusable energy.

"I'll procrastinate later..."
PacificaLimited is online now  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome
 


SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1