Hard pass , yawn …
Yeah , when you go to the parts bin and come up empty so you put stickers on it .SRT though and though.
Stickers, Rims, Tires...... and a roof rack.
My family uses a multi-bike unit off the rear hitch of the van. Has a half-fold setting you can still open the liftgate without removing the system. Reese maybe?
Road Tripper reminds me too much of Tipper Gore. Weird word association.
I have 20" wheels on my 2018, and the ride quality is excellent.How much is it to just add the roof rack on it's own? I remember reading an installation manual for it when I was looking to fix the rack that came stock on mine.
Actual road trippers will not be interested in the 20" rims and the lost ride quality.
I agree about the roof rack. It is useless to me. I have never used mine.Wish my Pacifica didn’t come with a stupid roof rack. Looks dumb and hurts mpgs on the highway. Ruins the clean lines.
Just my opinion. Roast me if you wish!
I get all the talk about aesthetics however many prefer the opposite to your suggestion, but first time I’m hearing that these hurt the mpgs. I can understand if the crossbars are deployed, but otherwise the rails themselves are pretty aerodynamic in my opinion and unlikely to cause any significant drag. Thoughts?Wish my Pacifica didn’t come with a stupid roof rack. Looks dumb and hurts mpgs on the highway. Ruins the clean lines.
Just my opinion. Roast me if you wish!
Man, that guy in the video narrating was annoying—nothing like reading from a script and not knowing anything about what you are actually reviewing. This is just as annoying as the reviews of the Pacifica hybrid with people saying it has a "CVT".The orange “Road Tripper” badging on the side is ugly but I have to admit the orange and black Chrysler logo looks pretty slick. I’d swap out my grill badge for one of these if I could get my hands on one.
View attachment 51711
On another note, here’s a nails-on-chalkboard video about the Road Tripper. I challenge you to watch it to the end without screaming at your device. (You’ll see what I mean pretty quickly. 😂)
Well, I worked 37 years for Chrysler and everything makes a difference.I get all the talk about aesthetics however many prefer the opposite to your suggestion, but first time I’m hearing that these hurt the mpgs. I can understand if the crossbars are deployed, but otherwise the rails themselves are pretty aerodynamic in my opinion and unlikely to cause any significant drag. Thoughts?
True, everything makes a difference, but not necessarily a significant or noticeable one. Wind resistance affects fuel economy at higher speeds, where the apparent wind vector will usually be mostly back, unless you're driving in a hurricane, so it's hard for me to imagine crosswinds on a roof rack affecting fuel economy. (15 MPH cross wind at 70 MPH = apparent wind angle of only 12 degrees.) Headwinds or tailwinds - yes.Well, I worked 37 years for Chrysler and everything makes a difference.
Any type of crosswind will catch the inner sides of the roof rails.
In a perfect world, the wind would always be at your back! Lol.
What kind of mpgs did you record on your trips?True, everything makes a difference, but not necessarily a significant or noticeable one. Wind resistance affects fuel economy at higher speeds, where the apparent wind vector will usually be mostly back, unless you're driving in a hurricane, so it's hard for me to imagine crosswinds on a roof rack affecting fuel economy. (15 MPH cross wind at 70 MPH = apparent wind angle of only 12 degrees.) Headwinds or tailwinds - yes.
I have a super-efficient Yakima roof box, advertised to have little effect on fuel economy. I tracked my fuel economy on several trips, with and without the box. I couldn't measure a difference in my fuel economy with that change, so it's hard for me to imagine that those roof rails without the crossbars deployed would significantly affect fuel economy.
I can understand the esthetics perceptions, but I myself prefer it with the roof rack, the chrome not as much as the S package. I'm calling it cost-cutting on Chrysler's part.