Here's what @freddief73 was answering @VelvetRedAWD(s) post #13 (top question) "Does Mobil 1 meet MS specs these days?"
Does Mobil 1 meet MS specs these days? It used to, many years ago.
Here's what @freddief73 was answering @VelvetRedAWD(s) post #13 (top question) "Does Mobil 1 meet MS specs these days?"Was this intended for another thread?
Not using Chrysler MS spec oil can jeopardize your warranty, according to a local dealer.It probably does, but they don't pay the fee to license said specification so they can't print it on the bottle. It doesn't matter anyways as it pertains to keeping your warranty valid. As long as you're using an API certified 0W20 oil you're meeting that requirement.
I recommend researching the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act and closely reading your owners manual. I'm confident you'll also conclude that your local dealership is incorrect. Of course, you're welcome to use whatever oil you like if it puts you at ease.Not using Chrysler MS spec oil can jeopardize your warranty, according to a local dealer.
Personally, I’d just use MS and not worry about it!
IIRC, the owner's manual states MS-6395 certified oil is "recommended,' not required; so I don't think using another spec of 0W-20 full-synthetic oil would affect the warranty. This is in contrast to what the owner's manual says about engine coolant where using anything other than MS-12106 will cause engine damage unless the error is caught quickly the engine is completely flushed with the correct coolant.The M-M act refers to using branded items to maintain a warranty.
That would be making you use MoPar oil.
It appears that Mobil 1 does meet the MS spec, maybe because they were losing sales. I guess I don’t understand why someone would not use an MS spec oil when it’s recommended in the owner manual and readily available.
All the engineering and engine testing is done with Pennzoil MS oil. FWIW, Pennzoil has been the factory fill for over 20 years.
Funny how folks spend many tens of thousands on a vehicle, then try to save pennies doing maintenance!
Thank you for the kind words. The goal is to determine what, if anything, owner's must do, or not do, to ensure they don't end up with failed engines, and to make whole those that have paid thousands for engine repairs.As a member of this wonderful Forum I just wanted to acknowledge the 2 Forum members that have done a fantastic job attempting to help resolve the Engine Failure issue by going the extra mile and putting it front and center for us all.
Thank you @PacificaMinivanFan& @MOPar
for taking this important issue head on with your threads & posts you've both done an incredible service for our community and it hasn't gone unnoticed.
I've seen enough pictured threads on numerous Chrysler Minivan Forums of Beat up Old Chrysler Minivans with completely Bald Tires literally held together by Rust, Bondo, Superglue & Duct Tape to believe every word of your statement. Worst of all is that they're Fully mis Maintained by their Self Professed, Backyard, Expert, unCertified Mechanic Owners claiming to know more & better than every actual Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep Certified Mopar Mechanic to not doubt a single word of your statement.Keep in mind that forums are where folks vent with like minded individuals.
The vast majority of folks don’t have any issues and aren’t on forums.
This goes for ANY subject!!!
+1 here. I can't help but wonder how many of the engine failures reported on this forum and on FB are from owners who hardly ever open the hood of their Pacificas!I've seen enough pictured threads on numerous Chrysler Minivan Forums of Beat up Old Chrysler Minivans with completely Bald Tires literally held together by Rust, Bondo, Superglue & Duct Tape to believe every word of your statement. Worst of all is that they're Fully mis Maintained by their Self Professed, Backyard, Expert, unCertified Mechanic Owners claiming to know more & better than every actual Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep Certified Mopar Mechanic to not doubt a single word of your statement.
I'm not saying everyone who does their own maintenance is like this just that many who do are. I have no doubt as to Maintenance Negligence (ignoring Recommended Schedules, using Cheapest, Non Synthetic Oils, wrong Coolant & Transmission Fluids, not replacing Filters or Worn weeping Gaskets when needed, never reading their owners manuals, etc. as being the major cause of most (not all) of these small percentage of V-6 3.6L Pentastar Engine Failures. And yes after doing everything wrong many will come here to vent then disappear into the night because they can't handle criticisms from the many owners here that actually do their own maintenance correctly.
Weird how after 40 years there's a rash of head gasket issues. Couldn't be a manufacturer defect. Naw. A manufacturer has never done that before. Especially Chrysler!+1 here. I can't help but wonder how many of the engine failures reported on this forum and on FB are from owners who hardly ever open the hood of their Pacificas!
Bingo. Can't wait for the class action.I'm one that constantly checks my engine and the hood is opened often. I check all my fluids, refill my washer fluid and do sniff tests and listen for any abnormal noises. I've always done this and I will continue to do it. The only way I caught this head gasket issue is because of my constant checking. Otherwise it would have overheated and it would have been for the lack of a better phrase FUBARed. I see tons of older generation Chrysler and Dodge vans out there held together with duct tape and super glue, but it seems the newer generations aren't seen nearly as often around here after 5-6 years. There's gotta be something that's contributing to that. It seems to start with model year 2008 and newer. It's the older ones I see driving around especially the fourth generation. Heck I even see a 1993 in pretty good condition driving around. I think this issue is more widespread than anyone thinks. It's just not reported and the people move on to a different brand. All I know is I'm glad I'm one that checks under the hood and I have my extended warranty. Even with that I've put way more into this van than I ever thought I would be, and the electrical gremlins haven't even surfaced yet. I'm sure that's only a matter of time.
I don't discount the Manufacturer Defect it's impossible to dismiss. Especially when some Engine FailuresWeird how after 40 years there's a rash of head gasket issues. Couldn't be a manufacturer defect. Naw. A manufacturer has never done that before. Especially Chrysler!
Yes agreed. That leads us back to the Real question "Why is the percentage higher on our 6th Generation Pacificas" but not so much with all the other Mopar vehicles using same V-6 3.6L Pentastar Engine since 2010?10,000,000+ 3.6L engines built.
If there was an accurate number of head gasket issues, bet it would be .01%
I'm one that constantly checks my engine and the hood is opened often. I check all my fluids, refill my washer fluid and do sniff tests and listen for any abnormal noises. I've always done this and I will continue to do it. The only way I caught this head gasket issue is because of my constant checking. Otherwise it would have overheated and it would have been for the lack of a better phrase FUBARed.
Nuts! @gmfreak just killed my theory. I was hoping the cause was neglect of the cooling system where the engine coolant reservoir would be filled with the wrong fluid and/or would be allowed to run bone dry, thus letting air into the system.+1 here. I can't help but wonder how many of the engine failures reported on this forum and on FB are from owners who hardly ever open the hood of their Pacificas!